IAM Concepts

Principle of Least Privilege

Diagram representing a glossary term in Oasis Security, illustrating key concepts in non human identity management

What is the Principle of Least Privilege?

The Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP) is a foundational cybersecurity concept that dictates all identities—whether human or non-human—should be granted the minimum level of access necessary to perform their specific tasks. This principle limits exposure to sensitive systems and data by reducing the number of permissions available to each identity, thereby minimizing potential attack surfaces. In the context of modern enterprise environments, PoLP applies not only to users but also to the growing population of non-human identities (NHIs), such as service accounts, API tokens, and machine credentials.

Why is it important?

Implementing PoLP is critical for reducing the risk of unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and lateral movement within an organization’s infrastructure. Overprivileged NHIs are increasingly targeted by attackers due to their ubiquity, lack of oversight, and absence of security controls like MFA. A compromised NHI with excessive permissions can lead to data breaches, infrastructure manipulation, or service disruption. By enforcing PoLP, organizations can prevent these risks, limit blast radius in case of compromise, and ensure that credentials are used strictly as intended.

What are common applications or use cases?

In practice, PoLP is applied through mechanisms such as role-based access control (RBAC), just-in-time (JIT) access, and ephemeral credentials. For example, a CI/CD pipeline may require temporary access to deploy code to a cloud environment. Instead of granting persistent administrative privileges, PoLP enforcement would provision narrowly scoped, time-bound permissions only during the execution phase. Similarly, cloud-native services like AWS IAM Roles or Azure Managed Identities can assign tightly scoped roles to NHIs based on workload requirements, ensuring minimal privilege exposure.

What is the connection to NHIs (Non-Human Identities)?

Applying PoLP to NHIs introduces unique challenges. NHIs often operate autonomously across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, with dynamic and ephemeral lifecycles. Unlike human users, they are typically provisioned by developers or automated systems without centralized governance. This results in permission sprawl, shadow identities, and outdated credentials. PoLP for NHIs must account for these patterns through lifecycle automation, behavioral analytics, secret rotation, and real-time privilege revocation. Without such controls, NHIs become a significant source of unmanaged risk.

Are there any notable industry data, trends, or standards?

Industry data highlights the urgency of enforcing PoLP for NHIs. Studies show that over 60% of cloud breaches involve misuse of NHI credentials, and more than 40% of machine identities retain excessive permissions beyond their intended use. Regulatory frameworks such as NIST SP 800-53 and NIST CSF 2.0 emphasize least privilege as a core component of workload identity governance. Emerging best practices include using AI-driven privilege optimization tools and confidential computing to enforce least privilege in runtime environments.

What is the broader impact or takeaway?

For modern organizations, PoLP is more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic imperative for securing complex, distributed infrastructures. When implemented effectively, PoLP reduces the risk of breach, limits insider threats, supports Zero Trust Architecture, and ensures that non-human identities operate within defined, auditable boundaries. In an era where NHIs outnumber human users and drive critical automation, enforcing least privilege at scale is essential to maintaining cloud security posture, operational continuity, and regulatory compliance.